Reviewer's Comments, paper 425 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = I don’t fully understand the problem. May we get a simple example, input plus our expected output? E.g., “That is, supposing we have some text” we need want to be able to generate a textual representation for it, such as “…[fill in the blank]…” At that point you can then move to your more advance example using XForms. I’m confused. We’ve been promised a paper that looks at how to do iXML in reverse. But the body of the material shows how a simple text syntax for XForms gets converted to XML fragments (fragments that are not XForms an sich, but seemingly a constructor for XForms? I don’t grok.). I would have expected something showing us how to do the reverse journey. I think I’m getting tripped up over the phrase “other direction,” which I read as synonymous as “reverse.” But I do not understand what the alternative is, or what the motivating problem is. “Markdown adv” In the HTML I reviewed, the hyperlink to the bibliography was not there. “they begin with the character” > “they begin with the characters” = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = I love this! Would you be willing to compile the grammar into an appendix? Interspersing it with narrative was absolutely the right way to go for the paper itself — I'm not very familiar with ixml yet but still felt like I could understand each step as it occurred. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =